If you're just joining the conversation, you'll want to read the first two posts in the series first (Part 1 and Part 2). In those posts I address the important questions of the role of Old Testament law for Christians and the purpose of the law in Leviticus that prohibits tattoos.
I've argued that Old Testament law is still relevant for followers of Jesus, but that we need to do the careful work of discerning the purpose of a law in order to see how it can and should inform our lives today. Now we've come to the practical question: so can I get a tattoo?
That all depends. The next step is to consider what tattoos in general communicate in your context and what the tattoo you want to get communicates. I began this series by talking about how my grandparents frowned on tattoos. Were they wrong? Not necessarily. In their generational and cultural context, a tattoo carried an ethos of rebellion and disrespect. In many cultures or contexts around the world today that may still be the case. Some jobs prohibit them. In some cases, a tattoo will close doors or shut down conversations. In other cases, a tattoo facilitates connections with others.
The operative question, then, is what will a tattoo communicate to those with whom I come in contact? Will it open up conversations? Or will it shut them down? Will a tattoo get in the way of my obedience to God's calling on my life? Will it interfere with ministry or relationships?
Tattoos are very common where I live in Southern California. For that matter, they're very common in rural Alberta and in Portland, too. That makes them not particularly edgy or rebellious, even in church or academic settings. At least three of my colleagues down the hall in Biola's Bible department have tattoos. Your setting might be different.
If you discern that a tattoo is not problematic in your context, then it's time to ask the more specific question: what does this particular tattoo communicate? Obviously you want to choose something that you will not tire of seeing. Tattoos are permanent! But beyond that, the most important question is whether your tattoo will conflict with your Christian testimony. Will it send mixed messages? Will it distract from your identity as a follower of Jesus? If so, then I would advise you not to get it because it falls into the same category as bodily disfigurement in Leviticus 19:28 that I discussed in the previous post.
My Tattoo, Hebrew for "Belonging to YHWH" |
For a holy people you are, belonging to YHWH [ליהוה] your God. YHWH your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.
The underlined text here matches what it says on the high priest's forehead medallion. The high priest literally bears God's name as he goes about his priestly duties. His life is dedicated to God's service.
Later in Scripture, Isaiah speaks of a future day when God would pour out his Spirit with the result that the people of Israel would again be eager to identify as covenant members:
Some will say, 'I belong to the LORD' [ליהוה]; others will call themselves by the name of Jacob; still others will write on their hand, 'The LORD's' [ליהוה], and will take the name Israel. (Isa. 44:5 NIV)
Both of these underlined phrases mirror what is written on the forehead of the high priest. They also bring to mind the righteous in Revelation 7 who are marked with God's "seal." Revelation 14:1 specifies that God's name was written on their foreheads. Seals with writing on them nearly always included the owner's personal name with "L" attached to the front of it indicating that the seal belongs to the person by that name. The most natural way to understand the seal on the foreheads of the righteous in Revelation is to suppose that it says LYHWH [ליהוה]. These people are the counterparts to those designated with the mark of the beast.
Here's how I see it: every human being throughout history bears the name of the one to whom they offer their allegiance. In John's vision in Revelation, the invisible becomes visible. Our allegiances become obvious.
Nizar Razzouk, 28th generation tattoo artist at Razzouk Tattoo in Old City Jerusalem |
Believe me when I say that I'm not trying to become "the tattoo lady." I'm still very cautious about permanent body markings. However, I hope that this series has helped to model the kinds of questions we should be asking of the biblical text as well as ourselves. The point is not to "get around" a biblical prohibition, but to understand why it matters to God so that we can respond faithfully. I pray that I have done so, and that these reflections have helped you to think well about how you can do so, too.
--------
If this series has piqued your curiosity about the biblical concept of bearing God's name, you can read further in my accessible book, Bearing God's Name: Why Sinai Still Matters (IVP), or in my more technical published dissertation, Bearing YHWH's Name at Sinai: A Reexamination of the Name Command of the Decalogue (Eisenbrauns). For a complete list of podcasts where I've talked about these concepts, click here.
It is an interesting topic and relevant in this day and age for the Church, for sure. Personally, I would rather err on the side of caution, but I understand that others see this differently. Getting a tattoo won't keep a person out of God's kingdom just like smoking won't. Whether or not it pleases God is another question and seems to be a gray area as you said.
ReplyDeleteMy question is about where the idea of imprinting ink into your skin in the form of tattoos came from in the first place. As you say, it is an ancient practice and as far as I can tell, it began with pagan groups. So that tells me that it was not God's influence but rather the influence of the powers of darkness that put it into the minds of human beings to prick their skin with permanent inks.
Then again, I also realize that people have been getting skin piercings forever, too, like nose rings and earrings. So how does one determine that those things are ok while the other is not? One could argue that nose rings or earrings are not permanent the way ink under the skin is, but I guess you can actually have a tattoo removed these days. And the command in Leviticus doesn't say to not pierce ears as I suppose that wasn't done "for the dead."
I wonder why God didn't have the priest tattoo his forehead rather than wear a medallion?
Some people today do get tattoos to honor loved ones - dead and alive. Is that still wrong? And how about people who get their entire arm or leg tattooed? How much tattooing is ok? I see many gang members and criminals with all kinds of tattoos and it makes me wonder if Christians should participate in tattooing.
Do you think that ancient Israelites did get tattoos for reasons outside of "for the dead?" I wonder. Was it only "for the dead" that tattoos were disallowed?
This sure seems to be a gray area like the issue of drinking wine/alcohol, and also tithing for the Church today. Lots of questions.
Another thought I have is that I generally look to the NT to see what parts of the "Law" are carried forward into the NT, and other than teaching that the body is the Temple of the Holy Spirit, I don't see tattooing addressed. I supposed if it is not clearly addressed, then it is up to each individual to seek God's will for them in each situation and follow after peace.
Thank you for the thoughtful article and dialogue!
Thanks for your thoughts, Laura.
DeleteThe high priest was not tattooed because his garments were not worn continually. That is, he was not always in a state of ritual purity so that he could enter God's presence. And when he died, his garments were passed on to his son to carry on the ministry.
We know that tattooing happened for slaves, but we don't have evidence of this in Israel (that I'm aware of). One of my students has a tattoo to honor her mom, who died. I doubt that this falls in the category of why the Israelites were disfiguring themselves for the dead. It's not a distressed, hopeless practice or an intent to make spirit-contact, but rather a way of remembering.
The New Testament uses Sinai laws in a variety of different ways, including ways that are surprising. I don't think it works to limit ourselves to the laws that are specifically mentioned in the NT, because the NT use is representative rather than systematic.
Glad you found the article helpful!
The way I see it: regardless of the reason, God said, "Don't get tatooed". We can guess at his reasons, but it's risky. Paul said, in essence, "It doesn't matter whether you're Jewish or Gentile, keeping God's commands is what counts." (I Cor. 7:19) And I don't see drinking wine as a gray area. In the kingdom God will prepare a banquet of aged wine. (Isaiah 25:8) In Jesus' parable (which is often misinterpreted), he identifies with the old patch and the old wine. (end of Luke 5) He explained that you don't use a new patch or new wine because it would be destructive to the garment and the wineskin. Judaism was likened to an old garment/wineskin, and he was emphasizing that he wasn't bringing a new religion, but an explanation of biblical Judaism.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of garments, do you wear polyester? Because if you do, by your own logic you are violating the laws of Leviticus. I don't say this to be cheeky, but to point out that every Christian I know uses reasoning to determine which laws to keep and which ones to ignore. I'm advocating for a more thorough and careful reasoning that takes historical, literary, and theological contexts into consideration.
DeleteThanks Carmen for the careful exposition and well thought-out principles. Your series highlights the importance of context - especially as it relates to the Church governed by grace and Israel governed by law (Rom 6:14). Love the tat!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Cory!
DeleteThis is a fantastic set of articles - not surprisingly. Thank you for bringing this topic up. I've noticed over the years that people who've told me that I need to obey Lev 19:28 never feel any need to obey Lev 19:27 themselves. In fact, there was a time when it was considered tacky to even have a beard, much less to not even trim the corners. When I went to a Christian university back in the 1980s, it was a violation of the honor code to grow a beard.
ReplyDeleteGlad you found these articles helpful! Christians are definitely selective about Leviticus. We need to think these things through more carefully!
DeleteThank you so much! Very well done. I was a youth pastor for a few years and this question came up every year. It was difficult to find solid materials that could be utilized for teaching middle and high schoolers. By the end, I concluded where you did, stressing the importance of wisdom for making the decision. I did end up using the (much maligned?) overgeneralization between sacrificial, moral and civil laws. When teaching, I stressed that this isn't a perfect description, but pedagogically I found the delineation helpful for students in showing how one can approach particular passages differently depending on the context. In your opinion, is it a good idea to utilize that schematic when teaching (especially a younger crowd) as long as it is nuanced or is it better to steer clear all-together? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment! I was hesitant about the civil/moral/ceremonial distinction, but, like you, used it because of its simplicity. However, Richard Averbeck's new book on law showed why those categories are misleading: the NT authors draw freely on all 3 categories as they talk about ethics for Christians. If you introduce the categories, it might be helpful to show how that happens.
DeleteBlessings as you invest in young people!
thanks for the article. as an Asian believer I respect my bros and sisters in Christ decision on tattoos. in my culture- tattoos are usually seen in religious context: usually inscriptions to ward off evil or incantations involving the spirit world. The other social attachment to tattoos are gangs and triads- not the sort your parents are proud of. in that context, I will avoid tattoos. For my Jewish fellow believers in Yeshua, I would encourage them to follow the Law (there are more than one ‘Law’ as I understand them) as the Lord God has commanded them to follow. Except for the law of atonement which is now perfected by Christ’s perfect sacrifice. For me, as a non-Jew [although my ancestor were in the same boat as Shem :-) ], I do not follow the Law for the simple reason that my fathers were not on that mountain. I do however study the Hebrew Scriptures to glean out the timeless principles that Adonai wants me to understand what pleases Him. Shalom to all.
ReplyDelete