Easton is approaching 21 months old, but his only words so far are 'Dada', 'Mama', Emma, and (if we ask him to say it) 'hot'. I suppose we could be worried (since we've met many kids his age who can say dozens of words by now), but his comprehension is great, and he communicates very effectively by pointing and using a system of grunts that we suspect is highly developed (think: tonal language). :)
Over the weekend I was reading Kevin Vanhoozer's Is There a Meaning in This Text? I was startled to find the following discussion of Plato's Cratylus, a dialogue on language theory. Bear with me:
"Cratylus [one of the characters in the dialogue] does not really appear to believe what we might call the 'imitation theory' of meaning. He follows Herclitus's notion that 'all is flux' and concludes that one ought not to say anything but only point with one's finger, since no true statement can be made about what is constantly changing." (17, emphasis mine)
So you see that we have confirmation of our son's brilliance. His apparent lack of verbal skills are a actually a deliberate attempt to represent postmodern theories of language. Who could have guessed?!